Scientists now better understand earths composition

Already the magnetic poles are being displaced increasingly. Thus today the magnetic pole is already displaced into the Canadian Ice Sea, while also the south pole has been dislocated, and moves in the direction of South America.

Scientists now better understand earths composition

Those who go along are well rewarded, others ignored, attacked, often destroyed. Climate science has to support CO2 warming. I wonder how many of the online nutters are being paid.

I suppose the oil industry could still make plastics and petrochemicals, which is a better use for a substance that required say 50 million years to form. They reach an audience in the tens of millions that way, with no opponents able to reply.

Why would they fool around in comment strings that a few hundred read, where they can be shown wrong by people who understand the science?

Another institution to add to my conspiracies folder! American Enterprise, Hoover, Heritiage, Marshall. Heartland, Competitive Enterprise, Cato.

Bill What do you have against GHGs?

Customers who bought this item also bought

If you fear warming than you want to put GHGs into the atmosphere. GHGs absorb the heat energy the sun sends into our world. What is wrong and, what concerns are very valid? Oh by the by, the site you sent me to, was slightly fraudulent. The depiction of the CO2 atom absorbing a photon and then emitting it acceding to the Law of Conservation of Momentum is false.

Some photons will even go right back the way they came. But it does state that GHGs in the air absorb incoming and outgoing heat.

OS the question is, is there more heat coming into the air or going out. The GHGs are just as absorbent of heart leaving as they are entering. But since the sun is much hotter than the earth, the heat trapped out is much greater than the earth heat trapped in.

Frequently bought together

Or in other words, about watts per meter squared is blocked out vs. Thus, the cooling effect of the GHGs is watts or so greater than the warming of the greenhouse effect. For a warming effect to be greater than the cooling effect the earth would have to give off more heat than the sun sent in, and that is impossible.

If I said something wrong, what did I say that you disagree with? That is the Biggest lie Warmers tell. Whereas the Industrial Revolution began in the mid 19th century. There was no real industry in the world in the 19th century. A few cities had an industrial society, but most of American and Europe was still rural farmland until the mid 20th century.

They will tell you it was all rural. Even big cities like Los Angeles, were mostly pastureland. Before that only the rich owned cars, and people lived in apartment buildings cause few could afford a home.

It is not until the arrival of the automobile society that human kind start to really put CO2 into the environment. Which means, it is impossible for the atmosphere to reach a saturation point until after the s, thus human kind could not possible be responsible for the warming after the end of the Little Ice Age in to the s.

As usual with these frauds, it did not talk about all the heat that is blocked out by the atmosphere. They talk about heat beig trapped in but not being trapped out. NO Experimentation to prove that the atmosphere only stops heat from leaving, and not from entering.Potassium-argon ‘dates’ of recent Mt.

Ngauruhoe lava flows. As you can see from the ‘dates’ in the above table the lava flows that were less than 55 years old were given dates from , years to million plus or minus 20 thousand years.

Here is an article that presents some food for thought for those who are having trouble with the core claim in the Billy Meier case, i.e. that he is meeting with, and getting information from, the extraterrestrial Plejaren human beings.. Please remember that we can't be spoon fed everything.

This information is provided in order to help out some of the overly educated, under-thinking "experts. In a recent Nature Sustainability paper, a team of scientists concluded that the Earth can sustain, at most, only 7 billion people at subsistence levels of consumption (and this June saw us at billion).Achieving ‘high life satisfaction’ for everyone, however, would transgress the Earth’s biophysical boundaries, leading to ecological collapse.

Feb 21,  · Willie Soon, a prominent global warming skeptic, says “no amount of money can influence what I say or do or research or write.” If recently released documents are accurate, he is a liar. Here is an article that presents some food for thought for those who are having trouble with the core claim in the Billy Meier case, i.e.

Scientists now better understand earths composition

that he is meeting with, and getting information from, the extraterrestrial Plejaren human beings.. Please remember that we can't be spoon fed everything.

This information is provided in order to help out some of the overly educated, under-thinking "experts. Beginning in , the drilling effort was led by the USSR’s Interdepartmental Scientific Council for the Study of the Earth’s Interior and Superdeep Drilling, which spent years preparing for the historic schwenkreis.com was started in parallel to the Space Race, a period of intense competition between the U.S.

and U.S.S.R.

The Earth’s carrying capacity for human life is not fixed | Aeon Ideas